Monthly Archives: February 2014

Out of Range by C.J. Box and other Mysteries

J writes…

I ran into our good reader friend Sue Q at the South Street Library the other day.

As you know, that’s not a library you go to if you’re looking for something specific. It’s more of a haven for readers. A brief escape to spend time among books.  A clean well lighted place, Hemingway might call it (though no grappa is served there).

I run into Sue Q a lot at the library. Not just the one on South Street. We’re both library habitué’s. Even when I bump into her outside of one, which I do on occasion, we trade book titles and recommendations.

This time when we met up we were both empty-handed. “What should I read?” we asked each other. Sue lead me to the B’s and filled my arms full of C.J. Box detective stories. “This guy’s great. It’s about a Game Warden out in Wyoming who solves mysteries.” As we walked on towards the C’s I pulled a Jackie Collins off the shelf…remember Poor Little Bitch Girl? I handed it to Sue Q. “It’ll definitely entertain you for an afternoon,” I told her.

So we traded.

Tit for Tat.

Or, in our case, Tit for Tetons.

UnknownOut of Range by C.J. Box: It’s like comfort food. It’s meatloaf for the brain. You get what you expect. First, you meet Joe Picket, the sleuth. He doesn’t mean to find trouble. The problem is, it seems to always find him. He’s made some enemies in the past. These adversaries, and the brief summaries of the stories that came before Out of Range, are briefly described and woven into the text early on. New opponents are introduced, and the current situation explained. Things are looking up for Joe and family. After –the last book scenario here—, he and his wife and kids are on solid ground, until—the new situation here—and now things are just going to go wrong until Joe can make them right again… or die trying. And he comes close to dying. But then he doesn’t. Along the way, readers are given clues and red herrings as they try to solve the mystery along with Joe.

As far as this type of genre goes, C.J. Box is pretty good. He’s engaging and writes well. His love for the northwest part of Wyoming shows through in beautiful descriptions of the land that pepper each chapter.

I like the formulaic mystery once in a while, though I rarely read two in the same series back to back.  As many variations exist as there are readers. But they all work from a similar blueprint. Diane Mott-Davidson is one of my favorites. Her P.I. is a caterer and she throws in recipes every few chapters. Delicious!

Unknown

The Puzzle Lady Mysteries (Parnell Hall), about a crime solving cross word puzzle editor, provides readers with a cross word every so often. There are Sudoku mysteries too (Kaye Morgan). Today I came across the Tea Shop Mysteries, a series by Laura Childs, wherein each who-dunnit comes with tea recipes and teatime tips.

735092                     kayemorganjuly1                      AgonyLeaves

You can find a crime-solving kitties (Lilian Jackson Braun’s, The Cat Who…), a private dick priest (Ralph McInerny’s Father Dowling), a sleuthing professor (Dan Brown’s Robert Langdon), a nosey couple (The Thin Man series by Dashiell Hammet)…and on and on. For the anal-retentive murder mystery consumer, there’s even a detective who solves crimes in alphabetical order (Sue Grafton’s novels starting with A is for Alibi through W is for Wasted).

Unknown-1         Unknown-2         Unknown-3         Unknown-5        Unknown-8

I was thinking about crime novels. Is there any walk of life that hasn’t already made the scene as a gumshoe? What can you come up with?

How about a Chemist by vocation, budding mystery writer by avocation, each crime committed with deadly compounds only he can determine.

Or an Executive Consultant who travels constantly for work and leisure finding intrigue wherever she goes. This one comes complete with mini travel logs offered every few chapters.

What about a Development Director/bird enthusiast, birdlike in his habits and intelligence, who spies more than just birds through his binoculars.

Comfort food for thought, Scramblers…

 

 

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

Silly Love Songs

“Be easy to approach and difficult to know.” I can’t remember where I heard this phrase about comportment, but I always loved it. Most of the really fascinating people I have ever met fit this simple description. While I don’t necessarily think of the phrase consciously when I’m meeting someone new, I do often reflect on it afterward. I suppose I mostly come up short at executing my own advice to be both approachable and – what? Deep? Mysterious?

Maybe I am just not deep.

For certain, I am sentimental. That trips me up a lot. Not that I am especially sentimental about things, (though I surely am sentimental about some things – oh, man.) It’s more that I am sentimental about people. It’s a trait that makes me predictable – and less interesting.

My wife Judy is difficult to know. I often try and fail to predict her. On this one point, though, she is pretty predictable: she is not very sentimental about most things or about occasions. She wants her birthday to be remembered – don’t get me wrong. But she doesn’t want a couple dozen roses on our wedding anniversary. Another example: Yesterday she asked if I want to do something with some friends this Friday evening. I said sure. She said, “It’s Valentine’s Day.” I said, “Oh, right. We could do something for it.” She said, “No. I don’t need to celebrate manufactured holidays.”

I liked that. She knows it’s Valentine’s Day – but it isn’t a thing. And that is mostly the way such occasions have gone for us. Over time, there has also been the organic effect of us naturally trying to make each day special in some way, rather than saving up “specialness” for mandated times and dates.

Still, it is nice to have a little something to give for certain occasions, even manufactured and mandated occasions. Being both sentimental and kind of cheap, mix tapes provided a great way through the years to turn over some mental space and think of just the right songs for Judy around certain occasions.

These are some songs that I am extra sentimental about. Maybe you can sprinkle them on to your own mix tape/playlist for Valentine’s Day or some other occasion:

I Only Have Eyes For You by The Flamingos.

A perfect song.

A perfect song.

I had surely heard this song many times before I was in college, but until then, I hadn’t really listened. It was during college in the mid-1980’s that my friend Bob Bennett had me listen to The Flamingos version again. Bob said this version of the song was perfect. I think he is right. It fairly drips with yearning in every second. There is the gently driving piano, the weird and dreamy reverb, the tender lead vocal, the echoing guitar, and the lyrical poetry. There is intimacy and ‘spareness’ to this song that is so winning.

This pretty song might make you want to dance together – slowly, slowly –
I Only Have Eyes For You by The Flamingos (7” single, 1959): http://bit.ly/Nyz8Wc

English Rose by The Jam.

Paul Weller was only 20 when he wrote and recorded this exotic and romantic masterpiece. It is about devotion. With his voice and quiet guitar, he captures the painful promise of youth, and also the mature willingness to become weary just from the plain and complicated act of loving.

This song might make you want to lie on the floor together – hold hands and just stare at the ceiling –

English Rose by The Jam, (from All Mod Cons, 1978.) http://bit.ly/1g2qY03

Maybe I’m Amazed by Paul McCartney.

I am absolutely baffled by my good fortune to be loved. (And I am often confused by a good number of other things.) Here, Paul McCartney brilliantly captures the bewilderment that life can cause and that love can help to assuage. And he lets you know how lucky he feels about that.

Cherry juice or blood - what will life serve you?

McCartney, 1970.

Life is not a bowl of cherries. Sometimes it is more like a bowl of blood. If you are very lucky, you will have someone with whom to face the bowl of blood –
Maybe I’m Amazed by Paul McCartney, (from McCartney, 1970.) http://bit.ly/1aRrG2s

For the Love of Big Brother by Eurythmics.

Really great songs can transport you in time. They can make everything melt away. They can distill feeling. Annie Lennox and Dave Stewart succeed here. This sultry song is about the mysterious and transcendent ability of love to help overcome even the worst obstacles and the bleakest times.

Love is transcendent.

Love is mysterious and transcendent.

Thirty years old, this dark but hopeful tune has not aged a second – 
For the Love of Big Brother by Eurythmics, (from 1984, 1984.) http://bit.ly/1g1lk0D
Posted in Music | Leave a comment

Cat on Cat’s

I have wrestled with how to write about Cat’s Cradle for a long time now.  I wanted to deliver something wonderful and insightful to The Scramble because this book deserves that. So here’s a small spoiler alert for Cat’s Cradle: every few pages the reader finds an immaculately written paragraph or a memorable ha-ha or a bit of imagination that skirts up against reality so closely you have to think twice about whether it could possibly happen or has happened already and was simply re-phrased  by  Vonnegut so neatly that it now reads utterly new.  But when it comes down to it and I am faced with page after page of Vonnegut’s smart and lively voice all I can honestly say in this review is: read it. Read Cat’s Cradle.  It was written in 1963 and it remains a clear-headed portrait of us.  Like all things Vonnegut, the book is a bit funny, a bit sad, and wise from start to finish.  That’s my review.   Below are the options I considered for the review but this book doesn’t need any of the fancy contortions I was considering.

  1. I was going to suggest literary genetics. I was going to compare Tarrantino’s writing with Vonnegut’s.  I wanted to posit that Vonnegut was really Tarrantino’s father and you could prove it by conducting a side by side comparison of their writing.  But that didn’t work out so well when I found a Tarrantino interview where T. claimed he was inspired by Elmore Leonard and Raymond Carver.  No mention of Vonnegut.
  2. I was going to compare Cat’s Cradle’s sparse and clear writing to another book I had just finished, Dora: A Headcase, which was a horrid meaningless little book that aspired to be the 21st century version of Catcher in the Rye.  Overwritten.  Vonnegut doesn’t  overwrite.  I was going to compare paragraphs from the two books.  And I was going to conclude that simplicity and directness is what distinguishes great writing.
  1. I was going to write about Bokononism which is the religion that Vonnegut develops in Cat’s Cradle.  But a person could get bogged down in covering Bokononism. Let me share a tidbit or two about Bokononism: the religious texts are written in the form of calyposos.; Ambrosia wrote “Nice, Nice, Very Nice” inspired by one of the calypsos in the book; and my friend Webb, who I haven’t spoken to in years and with whom I have never discussed Cat’s Cradle,  wrote on his Facebook page “I love my Karass” and I knew exactly what he meant.  Vonnegut keeps us tied together in his secret language.
  2. I was going to write about what may be my favorite passage of fiction of all time and compare it to my friend Foster’s favorite fiction passage.  And then I thought we could have a Scramble challenge and let people post their “favorite/best paragraph” from fiction.  That could be darn fun.   Anyway, I’ll end this review of Cat’s Cradle with a piece from the book, which I think may be one of the most wonderful passages of fiction of all time.
  3. ssage.  And then I thought we could have a Scramble challenge and let people post their “favorite/best paragraph” from fiction.  That could be darn fun.   Anyway, I’ll end this review of Cat’s Cradle with a piece from the book, which I think may be one of the most wonderful passages of fiction of all time.

“The trouble with the world was,” she continued hesitatingly, “that people were still superstitious instead of scientific.  He said if everybody would study science more, there wouldn’t be all the trouble there was.”

“He said science was going to discover the basic secret of life someday,” the bartender put in.    He scratched his head and frowned.  “Didn’t I read in the paper the other day where they’d finally found out what that was?”

“I missed that,” I murmured.

“I saw that,” said Sandra.  “About two days ago.”

“That’s right,” said the bartender.

“What is the secret of life?” I asked.

“I forget,” said Sandra.

“Protein,” the bartender declared.  “The found out something about protein.”

“Yeah,’ said Sandra, ‘that’s it.”

Nice, Nice, Very Nice.

 

Posted in Books | Leave a comment

Why I Stopped reading this book on Page 72


The Book:
A Killer in the Wind by Andrew Klavan

Why I stopped reading this book on page 71:


Reason 1. You didn’t have me at Hello.
I often skip over the acknowledgements when they’re at the beginning of the book.
I almost always read them when they’re at the back.
Especially when I like the book.
A little dessert to help you digest what you’ve just read.
This time they were right up front.
The last line caught my eye:
“And thanks beyond words to my wife Ellen Treacy, whose worth is far above rubies.”
At first, I thought this was a nice gesture of gratitude.
Then I started thinking about it.
Is Ellen satisfied that her worth has surpassed that of rubies?
Is she worried at all about where she fits in with the other gemstones?
What is she actually worth?
Would she have gotten an acknowledgement if she was worth less?

Does Andrew really love her as a person?
Surprisingly, these thoughts continued to trouble me as I continued on in my reading. 

Reason 2. Get Real.

First some background on the plot:

Our purported hero, Dan Champion, is a former NYPD undercover cop.
He broke the big Emory case, but wound up killing Emory.
In cold blood. Skipped that whole Miranda business.
He doesn’t remember doing this.
He doesn’t remember a lot of things.
He’s kind of a mess.

A few years go by.
He gets it together – to some extent.
Now he’s a small town detective.
But will his troubled past catch up with him?

I don’t know – I didn’t get to that part.

 Problematic:

As an NYPD undercover vice cop, this guy is so creeped out by the existence of a child prostitution ring that he can’t sleep. I don’t want to overgeneralize, but the New York City cops that I’ve run into don’t seem like the kinda guys that would lose too much sleep over underage hookers. But this guy? He has to self-medicate. HEAVILY. A couple
glasses of scotch and a sleeping pill? Nope. A little weed? Nope. Booze, weed, Xanax? Nope. He needs a highly dangerous, extremely powerful, illicit street drug to get a little sleep. Nothing else will work! Nothing. This drug leaves him nearly incapacitated during his waking hours.

C’mon?!?

I’m pretty good at suspending disbelief, but my limits were severely tested here.

Strike 3. He’s in love with his own hallucination?

“I thought of Samantha as I lay in the dark with Bethany soft beside me. Bethany’s cheek against my chest. Bethany’s hair against my cheek, Bethany’s skin against my hand. I thought of Samantha. More than three years had gone by since the Emory case. You would think that was time enough to get over a drug-induced hallucination. You would think so.
But I never really had.”

Yes – I would think so. Three years? Maybe three hours. Three or four days, tops.

This guy falls in love with his own subconscious image of the perfect woman and now he can’t get over her. He knows for certain that he can never commit to any other lover?

C’mon, man. Bethany is hot! Bethany is worthy of your love.
Maybe she’s not up there in ruby territory, but she’s got it goin’ on.

But our hero is gonna stick with dream-girl.
I hope they’re both very happy.
I’m moving on.
And not to page 72.

Posted in Books | Leave a comment